Long Shadows: Truth, Lies and History

Dear readers – this post is definitely outside my normal fare, however, I felt the need to comment in some way on Canada’s recently released Truth and Reconciliation Commission report, a damning examination of my country’s treatment of aboriginal peoples and something that the Chief Justice of our supreme court, Beverley Mclachlan, called ‘cultural genocide’.

The Commission defines cultural genocide in its introductory remarks:

Cultural genocide is the destruction of those structures and practices that allow the group to continue as a group. States that engage in cultural genocide set out to destroy the political and social institutions of the targeted group. Land is seized, and populations are forcibly transferred and their movement is restricted. Languages are banned. Spiritual leaders are persecuted, spiritual practices are forbidden, and objects of spiritual value are confiscated and destroyed. And, most significantly to the issue at hand, families are disrupted to prevent the transmission of cultural values and identity from one generation to the next.

In its dealing with Aboriginal people, Canada did all these things.

Long Shadows by Erna ParisErna Paris wrote Long Shadows: Truth, Lies and History in 2001 and in 2003 my book club read and discussed it. Quill & Quire states that Long Shadows is “a monumental study of the schism between real and ‘official’ national histories” while Michael Ignatieff (author, academic and former leader of the Liberal Party of Canada) calls it a “tenacious and intelligent investigation of the way nations lie to themselves, and how these lies scar national identities”.

Paris’s book examines what occurred in Germany (the holocaust), France (the Vichy regime’s participation in the holocaust), Japan (the Rape of Nanking), the US (slavery), South Africa (Apartheid), the former Yugoslavia (long-standing hatreds squashed by communist rule) and how these countries dealt with their reprehensible actions.

When the Truth and Reconciliation report was released two weeks ago , politicians, journalists, members of aboriginal communities and ordinary citizens spoke out and wrote about their outrage. And truly, what happened in our residential schools and beyond was profoundly outrageous.

What I remember of our book club discussion was not just the heartfelt condemnation of the nations Erna Paris examined, but also the smug sense that Canada had little to be ashamed of. Perhaps our incarceration of Japanese Canadians during WWII and our refusal to admit Jewish refugees fleeing the Nazis deserved black marks, but we are basically good, kind Canadians, always ready to lend a helping hand, open to people from around the world, and supportive of international peace-keeping efforts.

Not so fast. Wipe that smug smile off our collective faces, Canada. Every one of us should read (or in my case, re-read) Erna Paris’s compelling account of what happens when proper reconciliation does not occur. (The Armenian genocide comes to mind as a very recent commemorative event. Turkey continues to deny what happened.)

Erna Paris explains that ordinary people will remember even when they are ordered not to. Victims (and the descendants of victims) will not disappear. An environment of impunity and public apathy encourages evil behaviour. Impunity legitimized by amnesty is unjust to the victims and to society.

Based on her in-depth examinations, Paris concludes that truth and reconciliation alone do not add up to justice. Perhaps Canada’s commission is the beginning of a long path to setting the record straight, embedding public accountability and instituting fairness as we move forward. The past can only be managed with remembrance, with accountability and with justice.

What are you going to do?

FOR POSTS ON READING AND WRITING HISTORICAL FICTION follow A WRITER OF HISTORY (using the widget on the left sidebar)

M.K. Tod writes historical fiction and blogs about all aspects of the genre at A Writer of History. Her latest novel, LIES TOLD IN SILENCE is set in WWI France and is available from Amazon, NookKoboGoogle Play and iTunes. Her debut novel, UNRAVELLED: Two wars. Two affairs. One marriage. is also available from these retailers.

Mary can be contacted on Facebook, Twitter and Goodreads.

Share this post

About the Author

Picture of Meet M.K.Tod

Meet M.K.Tod

The historical fiction author behind A Writer of History...

All Categories

Subscribe to the Blog

Receive the latest posts on writing and reading historical fiction via email.

Join 2,208 other subscribers

One Response

  1. With all due respect to Ms. Paris, it is inappropriate to compare what Canada (and the US) did to the native Indians to what the Germans did to the Jews. THERE IS NO MORAL EQUIVALENCE. By doing so, you downplay the serious nature of the Holocaust and whitewash the evils of the Nazism. Books like “Long Shadows” are part of a huge anti-colonialist movement that is motivated by a core ideology which is “theft.” Theft is the underlying principle behind modern Progressivism. The Progressive argument builds on the anti-colonial argument but expands it to a massive indictment of America (and Canada), of American (and Canadian) history, of our past, and of America (and Canada) today. It has a historical component and a contemporary component. Historically Progressives say America (and Canada) became wealthy because they stole their countries from the native Indians. Nowadays, the progressives say that American (and Canadian) capitalism is based on theft, depriving people of “their fair share.” Obviously if American (and Canadian) wealth is based on theft, America (and Canada) are morally illegitimate. The money must be, in some sense, given back, and this is the ethical justification for Progressive Redistribution. Redistribution not only of income but also of wealth.

    In a speech in 1961, Che Guevara saw Cuba as the launching point for an anti-colonial wave. “Victory by the popular forces in Latin America is clearly possible,” he said, which could be “the first stage in completely destroying the superstructure of the colonial world.” Anti-colonialism, in that sense, meant curtailing the power of Western/capitalist nations. While it’s appropriate to honor and make amends to the First Nations, tearing down our entire structure of Free Market Capitalism is tantamount to national suicide.

Leave a Reply