Unravelled – final tuning

When is your manuscript done? A facetious answer is ‘when it’s done’. And there are endless opportunities to tweak and tighten but I thought I was done when I sent Unravelled out to a few people in the historical fiction community who had offered to provide a blurb for me – after reading the novel, of course.
But hold on. You’re not quite there, Mary.
One individual who is well known for insightful reviews along with her own writing offered excellent feedback and as a result I just had to open up the Word document again a few days ago. One of her suggestions involved cutting out some quoted material I included either in the form of radio broadcasts or newspaper articles. Another involved bringing more life to some of the minor characters in the novel.
Here’s a before and after of the same scene. Edward and Ann Jamieson are gathered around the radio with their teenage children Emily and Alex. The war has dragged on for more than four years. It’s June 6th, 1944, what we now call D-Day.
May 31 Draft
On the evening of June sixth, the whole family remained glued to the radio as news of the D-Day landings came through. Winston Churchill spoke, his growling voice riveting.
“During the night and the early hours of this morning, the first of the series of landings in force upon the European Continent has taken place. In this case, the liberating assault fell upon the coast of France. An immense armada of upwards of four thousand ships, together with several thousand smaller craft, crossed the Channel. Massed airborne landings have been successfully effected behind the enemy lines, and landings on the beaches are proceeding at various points at the present time. The fire of the shore batteries has been largely quelled. The obstacles that were constructed in the sea have not proved so difficult as was apprehended. The Anglo-American Allies are sustained by about eleven thousand first-line aircraft, which can be drawn upon as may be needed for the purposes of the battle. Reports are coming in in rapid succession. So far the commanders who are engaged report that everything is proceeding according to plan. And what a plan! This vast operation is undoubtedly the most complicated and difficult that has ever taken place. It involves tides, wind, waves, visibility, both from the air and the sea standpoint, and the combined employment of land, air and sea forces in the highest degree of intimacy and in contact with conditions which could not and cannot be fully foreseen.
“There are already hopes that actual tactical surprise has been attained, and we hope to furnish the enemy with a succession of surprises during the course of the fighting. The battle that has now begun will grow constantly in scale and in intensity for many weeks to come, and I shall not attempt to speculate upon its course. This I may say, however. Complete unity prevails throughout the Allied armies. There is a brotherhood in arms between us and our friends of the United States. There is complete confidence in the supreme commander, General Eisenhower, and his lieutenants, and also in the commander of the Expeditionary Force, General Montgomery. The ardour and spirit of the troops, as I saw myself, embarking in these last few days, was splendid to witness. Nothing that equipment, science or forethought could do has been neglected, and the whole process of opening this great new front will be pursued with the utmost resolution both by the commanders and by the United States and British governments whom they serve. I have been at the centres where the latest information is received, and I can state to the House that this operation is proceeding in a thoroughly satisfactory manner. Many dangers and difficulties, which at this time last night appeared extremely formidable, are behind us. The passage of the sea has been made with far less loss than we apprehended. The resistance of the batteries has been greatly weakened by the bombing of the Air Force, and the superior bombardment of our ships quickly reduced their fire to dimensions, which did not affect the problem. The landings of the troops on a broad front, both British and American—Allied troops, I will not give lists of all the different nationalities they represent—but the landings along the whole front have been effective, and our troops have penetrated, in some cases, several miles inland.”
Broadcast the following day, firsthand accounts transported Edward to the heat of battle …
June 27th Draft
On the evening of June sixth, Edward and his family remained glued to the radio as news of the D-Day landings came through. Winston Churchill spoke, his growling voice riveting.
“During the night and the early hours of this morning, the first of the series of landings in force upon the European Continent has taken place. An immense armada of upwards of four thousand ships, together with several thousand smaller craft, crossed the Channel.”
Like a sail filled with buoyant breezes, every word Churchill spoke lifted Edward’s spirits. We’ll do it, he thought. The end is finally in sight.
As Churchill continued Edward recalled the fall of Tobruk when the British Prime Minister had spoken. The man’s gravelly voice with its slow steady beat combined with evocative images and simple words still had the power to inspire. “Massed airborne landings . . . vast operation . . . formidable danger and difficulty . . . tactical surprise . . .”
Edward had played a part in that element of surprise. A smile filled his body even though his face showed nothing but concern.
When Churchill finished, Alex was the first to speak. “What does it mean, Dad?”
“It’s the invasion of Europe we’ve all been waiting for. Churchill and Roosevelt must believe that the time is ripe. I saw evidence of troop buildup while I was in England, but the scale of our attack is incredible. And it looks like the Germans were caught napping.”
“That’s fantastic news, isn’t it?” Alex’s tone was part question, part assertion.
“Definitely.”
“Why is this different from Dieppe?” Alex, who sat in his usual spot on the floor, turned around to look at his father.
“Well, one difference is the single command structure under General Eisenhower. Churchill mentioned that in his speech, didn’t he? It helps eliminate confusion and rivalry between the countries and allows clearer communication of successes and failures as our troops attack. Imagine playing football without a quarterback.”
“That wouldn’t work very well,” Alex said.
“You’re right. Same thing on a massive scale in war. Beyond Eisenhower, there’s the strength of combining American British forces and all the bombing we did leading up to today. And the element of surprise. ”
“It’s amazing to think that Hitler didn’t know where we were going to attack,” said Emily.
“You’re right, sweetheart. It’s amazing.”
Broadcast the following day, firsthand accounts transported Edward to the heat of battle …
Perhaps I made the typical mistake of falling in love with my research?

Share this post

About the Author

Picture of Meet M.K.Tod

Meet M.K.Tod

The historical fiction author behind A Writer of History...

All Categories

Subscribe to the Blog

Receive the latest posts on writing and reading historical fiction via email.

Join 2,207 other subscribers

13 Responses

  1. Hi Mary. I think it’s always an occupational hazard for us historical fiction writers to love our research too much. It’s only because we tend to find those shiny tidbits that most people are unfamiliar with, and we’re so excited to share them with the world!
    I think your new draft of the scene reads much better – it has more movement to it, and it explains the event through the characters’ perspectives and understandings. Kudos to you for being willing to make the cut. 🙂

  2. I know a lot more about your characters from this rewritten section. That’s the important thing. What Churchill said is simply a catalyst to move your story along.
    It’s been part of my plan to share my manuscript with other historical fiction writers before I go to publishing. Your experience reinforces the wisdom of such a move.

  3. The revision makes for a much better emotional connection with the characters. I’ll quote my MFA professor with regards to my work-in-progress historical fiction: “never allow the facts to interfere with the narrative.”

  4. After about, oh I don’t know, twenty different readings, my friends kept asking me why I was going through my MS so much. I would always answer ‘because it’s not finished.’ They always shrugged and I could tell they thought I was some anal, lunatic who needed everything to be perfect. I don’t know why that held any fault, who doesn’t want their craft to be as close to perfect as it can be, but anyways, I think every writer knows when their work is done. And, until that time, they should edit and revise until their hearts content, no matter what anyone says. I agree with the others about your changes, more readable and emotionally drawing to the characters. 🙂

    1. Many thanks, Angela. One of the things I love about this new career of mine is all the amazing people we ‘meet’. Saw your post today about declining a publishing offer. Wow, what guts that must have taken.

Leave a Reply