• About Me
  • About this blog
  • My Writing
    • Lies Told in Silence
    • Unravelled
  • One Writer’s Voice

A Writer of History

~ thoughts on writing & reading historical fiction

A Writer of History

Tag Archives: readers’ perspectives

More Features of Hit Lit

08 Saturday Sep 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Historical Fiction, Top Historical Fiction Authors

≈ 8 Comments

Tags

Gone with the Wind, historical fiction, ingredients for best sellers, James W. Hall, Jaws, Peyton Place, readers' perspectives, The Bridges of Madison County, The Da Vinci Code, The Dead Zone, The Exorcist, The Firm, The Godfather, The Hunt for Red October, To Kill a Mocking Bird, Valley of the Dolls

Two days ago, I wrote about the ‘tricks of the trade’ that make a bestseller so gripping. The analysis comes from James W. Hall’s book on Hit Lit. Ultimately I’d like to consider Hall’s twelve features against some of the top historical fiction authors that readers identified in the survey and these posts are a way for me to clarify ideas in my own mind. Writing helps me think.

Let’s have a look at a few more features:

Feature #2: Raise the controversy of the day

For some hot-button issue to have real wallop, it also must express some larger, deep-seated, and unresolved conflict in the national consciousness.

Hall’s book is peppered with references to the American experience. (This is the time to explain that I am Canadian and hence accustomed to living in the shadow of our great neighbour to the south.) He gives examples of hot-button issues from the twelve bestsellers he’s chosen.

Gone with the Wind – published in 1936 where the hot-button issue was capitalism and its many failures. Remember this is a time when The Depression was a recent experience. In Peyton Place – the hot button was sex. To Kill a Mockingbird – published at a time when race issues were boiling. The Hunt for Red October – cold war paranoia. John Grisham’s The Firm – corporate greed. The Da Vinci Code – religious corruption and conspiracy. “And all of these stories explore some hot-button social issue of their day that is rooted in a long-term national dispute.”

Question: does historical fiction explore today’s hot-button issues or those of long ago?

Feature #3 – “Colossal characters doing magnificent things on a sweeping stage”

Hall asserts that bestsellers pit relatively ordinary people against high stakes situations. Readers are intended to connect to these characters, to be inspired by the aspirations, actions and bravery of everyday heroes like Scout Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird, Mitch McDeere, a small town boy made good in The Firm, Robert Langdon – really just a rumpled professor – in The Da Vinci Code. The characters become colossal because of the fight they take on. David and Goliath come to mind.

Question: are readers fascinated with historical fiction because it allows them to see the everyday person in famous people like Eleanor of Acquitaine or Thomas Cromwell?

Feature #4 – “America as paradise”

America as the new Eden. A land of second chances, fresh beginnings in the virginal wilderness.

Often the novel’s hero is alienated or exiled from their ‘homeland’ and struggles to return. That ‘homeland’ can be the land itself such as in Gone With the Wind and Scarlett’s home Tara, but it can also be a state of innocence, youthful idealism, a time of security, a parent or grandparent.

Feature #5 – “An abundance of facts and information”

Hall explains  that readers want to be informed, to “learn about the larger world”. Whether its the intricacies of a nuclear-powered submarine or the workings of a prestigious law firm or the “double-dealing of showbiz”, readers are fascinated with the facts and figures and the social arrangements and codes of behaviour within these worlds. Readers “read in order to peer inside secret places not open to them otherwise”.

Fact-based fiction has broad appeal because it is simple, hearty fare. No highly refined palate required. Anyone can buy a ticket.

Historical fiction certainly offers an abundance of facts and information.

Feature #6 – “All twelve of these bestsellers expose the inner workings of at least one secret society.”

Let’s have a look at Hall’s examples. The Godfather exposes the mafia. Jaws exposes the secrets of the sea. The Da Vince Code – Opus Dei. The Bridges of Madison County – the secret world of adultery. To Kill a Mockingbird – the KKK.

And here’s the punchline – our simple, everyday heroes triumph over these secret societies. Good over evil.

Question: in historical fiction do we see monarchies and the nobility as secret societies?

The final six features will be posted on Monday.

Historical research is like an iceberg

22 Tuesday May 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Historical Fiction, Historical Fiction Survey, Researching historical fiction

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

a writer's research process, Catherine M Wilson, Elizabeth Chadwick, historical fiction survey, MM Bennetts, readers' perspectives, what detracts from historical fiction

The post Historical Fiction Would Be Better If, created lots of discussion with well known authors like Elizabeth Chadwick and MM Bennetts adding their thoughts to the mix. Three topics bubbled to the surface:

  • dialogue – achieving the right balance between authenticity and clarity and pace
  • research – enough to make the period come to life without weighing the story down
  • emotional anachronisms – keeping characters believable in the context of their times (the term emotional anachronisms was introduced by MM Bennetts)

Catherine M Wilson offered this point: “I think of research as the whole iceberg. What actually appears in the book is that little bit floating above the surface, but it rests on the huge block of ice that lies unseen below the waterline.”

I’ve interpreted her words and the comments of others in this picture:

Keeping the iceberg in mind seems like a good idea to me. I’ve often spent hours researching a particular area only to write one or two sentences, any one of which might later be deleted when striving to improve the pace and energy of my novels.

If you’re a writer, what do you think? If you’re a reader, which authors do you think are masters of the iceberg?

Historical Fiction Survey – Top 20 Authors

26 Thursday Apr 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Historical Fiction, Historical Fiction Survey

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

Anya Seton, Bernard Cornwell, best sellers, Diana Gabaldon, Elizabeth Chadwick, Geraldine Brooks, historical fiction survey, Hollick, James Clavell, James Michener, James W. Hall, Jean Auel, John Jakes, Julia Quinn, Kate Quinn, Ken Follett, Lindsey Davis, Mary Renault, Philippa GRegory, readers' perspectives, Sarah Waters, Sharon Kay Penman, top 20 authors, top 20 historical fiction authors, Wilbur Smith

PLEASE NOTE: an update to this list with a few additional authors now exists. Please see further news for the latest.
602 survey participants provided their favourite authors in a recent historical fiction survey. The top 20 authors are:

Other highlights:

  • 404 different authors were chosen by only one person; a further 99 authors were chosen by only two people
  • several top 20 authors are deceased; Plaidy, Seton and Heyer are mainly favoured by those who are 40 and older
  • beyond the top 20, a further 19 authors (see below) were selected as favourites by ten or more readers
  • all authors except Colleen McCullough (Australia) and Geraldine Brooks (Australia and US), live in either UK or US
  • readers chose 28 female authors and 11 male authors
  • each geographic region reads its own to some extent, but selects the same ‘global’ authors in high proportions
  • men read female authors and women read male authors; the men reading female authors tend to choose those who include mystery, crime or war in their novels
  • 14 of 54 Cornwell mentions are men; 9 of 36 Follett mentions are men; these are the only two authors with more than 5 mentions amongst male respondents

What do the top authors have in common?

For the most part, these authors base their stories in long ago periods, writing about well-known historical figures either in a central of significant role. Most have written series or have concentrated on a particular time period so readers know what to expect and are familiar with their main characters.

According to a recently published book about best sellers (James W. Hall, Hit Lit: Cracking the Code of Twentieth Century’s Biggest Bestsellers), the three critical ingredients are maverick heroes, high stakes and hot sex. It seems to me that many of these authors fit that formula.

Check Sarah Johnson’s blog, Reading the Past, for further comments on the top authors.

On a personal note … I now have some highly recommended new authors to read.

Historical Fiction Would Be Better If … 2012 Historical Fiction Survey

18 Wednesday Apr 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Historical Fiction, Historical Fiction Survey

≈ 47 Comments

Tags

2012, historical fiction survey, historical inaccuracies in fiction, readers' perspectives

588 readers responded with enthusiasm to the question “what detracts from your enjoyment of historical fiction”.

44% Inaccuracies – includes seeing modern sensibilities in a historic setting, anachronisms, dialogue that does not fit the period, poor research, moving major dates to suit a story line and so on.

2% Dialogue – several people complained that using too much dialogue from a long ago period takes away from the ease of reading.

9%  Sex & Violence – this refers to stories with too much sex and violence rather than too little :) In addition, some readers specifically mentioned gory battle scenes.

15%  Too much detail – refers to stories weighted down with reams of historical detail, almost as though the author wanted to include every bit of research found on a particular aspect of history.

15% Pace, Plot & Character – in the main, these comments referred to problems that can cause any story to fail. Poor writing, unrealistic characters, slow pace, stories that are too sensational. A few comments spoke of ‘wallpaper historicals’ and ‘romance disguised as historical fiction’. Another reader referred to the problem of ‘history being a substitute for story.

And 24% offered a range of other reasons from ‘I just don’t like historical fiction’ to ‘I haven’t got enough time to read’.

Let’s hear from a few readers directly:

I don’t like authors who just put in “Wikipedia” paragraphs instead of building historical atmosphere. The dialogue and setting should be natural, and appropriate to the characters, not contrived to check the boxes of historicity. The atmospheric details shouldn’t be over-explained like a dictionary, either.

Inaccuracies (minor changes to historical events) are OK if needed by the story and justified/explained in an afterword. I generally judge on the quality of the writing – even a good yarn can be spoiled by sloppy writing.

When an author tries to force an accent in writing. Over the top Scots, ridculous medieval talk, cockney that’s hard to understand…

When the history of the period and the story aren’t seamlessly drawn. If one is sacrificed for the other, it makes the overall pace of the story drag.

When they author deviates heavily from the historical record, such as making up battles or encounters that did not happen. Very irritating.

Oversexualization, wild inaccuracies, grotesquely detailed scenes of violence (Game of Thrones, for example), marginalization and objectification of women.

Characters that don’t interest me, poor pacing and shoddy research.

Too much grit – gore & violence Too much bodice ripping – I prefer to stay outside the bedroom if possible; and if not, I don’t need a catalogue of body positions.

Dry writing style with too much information fired at the reader like a textbook or recited by rote instead of incorporating details by making them part of the story. I like to learn stuff without being aware that I’m learning.

What do you think? I’d love to hear more from both readers and writers on this topic.

Historical Fiction Survey – Reasons not to read Historical Fiction

17 Tuesday Apr 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Historical Fiction, Historical Fiction Survey

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

historical fiction survey, Mary Tod, readers' perspectives

The survey asked those who rarely or never read historical fiction to comment on their reasons. Only 62 responded – a small sample from which to draw significant conclusions.

  • 34% indicated a preference for non-fiction or biographies
  • 17% said they like other genres such as mystery, literary fiction, Sci-fi and so on or that they preferred reading a wide range of genres
  • 10% offered various perceptions like ‘it’s boring’ or ‘it’s not for young people’ or ‘it’s only for the beach’
  • 8% expressed concerns about the quality of historical fiction
  • 8% said they don’t have enough time; this group is exclusively male

One further point of interest: several writers commented that they read almost exclusively historical non-fiction as a basis for writing historical fiction.

I’ve finished cataloguing favourite authors and will soon post on that topic. Stay tuned. Comments welcome.

Recent Posts

  • The blurring of truth and fiction
  • An Interview with Historical Fiction Author – Helen Bryan
  • Edward IV’s Women by Anne Easter Smith
  • Favourite historical fiction author – Edward Rutherfurd
  • Writing a book blurb

Archives

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

BLOG CATEGORIES

Author Entrepreneur Book Club Gals Connecting Readers & Writers Family History Guest Posts Historical Fiction Historical Fiction Blogs Historical Fiction Enthusiasts Historical Fiction Survey Historical Non-Fiction Industry News Military Stories Researching historical fiction Top Historical Fiction Authors Top Historical Fiction Sites Uncategorized Writing about WWI Writing about WWII Writing Process

CONNECT ON FACEBOOK

CURRENTLY READING

No data found
Book recommendations, book reviews, quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists

Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.