• About Me
  • About this blog
  • My Writing
    • Lies Told in Silence
    • Unravelled
  • One Writer’s Voice

A Writer of History

~ thoughts on writing & reading historical fiction

A Writer of History

Monthly Archives: April 2012

Top Historical Fiction Authors – Further News

27 Friday Apr 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Historical Fiction Survey

≈ 7 Comments

Tags

Edward Rutherfurd, Lisa See, reading the past, Sarah Dunant, top historical fiction authors, Tracy Chevalier

Did your mother ever tell you that haste makes waste?

Yesterday, after posting the top historical fiction authors, I checked the comments at Reading the Past where Sarah Johnson had also mentioned the top 20, and found a query about Tracy Chevalier. Interesting point, I thought. I certainly loved the two of her books that I read. Perhaps she missed the cutoff point. I decided to check.

I am embarrassed to say that the methodology I used for counting was not sufficiently thorough. As a result, I have now completely redone the count with the assistance of my Excel savvy, and very patient, husband.

Tracy Chevalier along with Sarah Dunant, Lisa See and Edward Rutherfurd should have been included.

Revised Top Authors Lists

Forty names in total. All but Alan Furst, Kate Quinn and Julia Quinn remain on the list in roughly the same order. Congratulations to those who have been added.

  • a few author counts have gone up or down
  • readers chose 29 female authors and 11 male authors
  • as an update to what I reported yesterday, 14 of 58 Cornwell mentions are men; 8 of 37 Follett mentions are men
  • overall, men offered fewer favourites than women (which made counting their entries easier)

Every author mentioned by every survey participant is now accurately reflected in a comprehensive Excel spreadsheet. That’s 2366 names that I can sort and count for future purposes.

I apologize for any inconvenience I may have caused to Sarah Johnson who graciously hosted yesterday’s list.

WWI Fashion – a time of change

27 Friday Apr 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Researching historical fiction

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

One Writer's Voice, WWI, WWI Fashion

Source: Henry Madden Library

One of the popular posts on my previous blog – One Writer’s Voice – is a post about WWI fashion. Many of the sites referred to below have helped me write the small details that add to a novel’s authenticity.

Lies Told in Silence, which is currently in the hands of my agent, is set in WWI France with characters representing three generations. Matters of fashion were important considerations in numerous scenes and I found it fascinating to see the changes in women’s clothing that occurred in that time period.

Helene Noisette, the main character, is fifteen when the novel begins in 1913, Lise is her mother and Mariele her grandmother.

According to www.fashion-era.com , the  French called the era from 1895 to 1914 La Belle Époque,  a time “of beautiful clothes and the peak of luxury living for a select few – the very rich and the very privileged through birth”.

Monica Fusich created a special collection for the Henry Madden Library at California State University. She has the following comments about styles in 1898:

The large sleeves have deflated to small puffs on the shoulder, with the rest of the sleeve being fitter. Hair is worn in the ‘Gibson Girl’ style, puffed around the face and pulled into a pompadour.

I like to imagine that Mariele – the grandmother – would have worn clothes such as these and might feel conflicted about new fashions of the early 1900′s and beyond.

Styles changed from the S-curve of the turn of the century to straighter, simpler lines and as WWI began skirt lengths rose to six or eight inches above the ground, simpler styles took over, bras were introduced and women even began to wear pants. It seems to me that Lise would be open to these simpler styles.

While the suffragette movement had considerable influence, many of these changes came about because women took over jobs previously done by men. A site called Fashion of the Ages has an interesting article about changes to women’s clothing.

During the war, a dye shortage and fabric shortages encouraged a certain utilitarian drabness in dress, but the most noticeable change engendered by the war was a relaxation of the formal rules of attire which had bound men and women’s dress since early in the Victorian era. Not only did women’s hemlines rise to mid-calf length, but more exciting yet, women wore these shorter styles with sexy heeled shoes and flesh toned silk stockings, not high button boots.

Source: Fashion of the Ages

Helene, the youngest of the three women, is a teenager when the story opens and eager to try new styles.  As war unfolds, she takes on adult responsibilities including duties that men would normally handle.  This character even adopts men’s trousers as both a practical and comfortable style of dress.

In my travels I have found other websites with WWI photos and fashion information.

Victoriana Magazine http://www.victoriana.com/edwardianfashions/

The Costumer’s Manifesto http://www.costumes.org/History/100pages/1910links.htm

From the search engine Bing a collection of WWI photos http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=WWI+France+women+pictures&FORM=IGRE#

From ww1photos.com, a section on the homefront illustrates women’s fashion, particularly through images of the kind of work women did during the warhttp://www.ww1photos.com/TheHomefront.html

Historical Fiction Survey – Top 20 Authors

26 Thursday Apr 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Historical Fiction, Historical Fiction Survey

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

Anya Seton, Bernard Cornwell, best sellers, Diana Gabaldon, Elizabeth Chadwick, Geraldine Brooks, historical fiction survey, Hollick, James Clavell, James Michener, James W. Hall, Jean Auel, John Jakes, Julia Quinn, Kate Quinn, Ken Follett, Lindsey Davis, Mary Renault, Philippa GRegory, readers' perspectives, Sarah Waters, Sharon Kay Penman, top 20 authors, top 20 historical fiction authors, Wilbur Smith

PLEASE NOTE: an update to this list with a few additional authors now exists. Please see further news for the latest.
602 survey participants provided their favourite authors in a recent historical fiction survey. The top 20 authors are:

Other highlights:

  • 404 different authors were chosen by only one person; a further 99 authors were chosen by only two people
  • several top 20 authors are deceased; Plaidy, Seton and Heyer are mainly favoured by those who are 40 and older
  • beyond the top 20, a further 19 authors (see below) were selected as favourites by ten or more readers
  • all authors except Colleen McCullough (Australia) and Geraldine Brooks (Australia and US), live in either UK or US
  • readers chose 28 female authors and 11 male authors
  • each geographic region reads its own to some extent, but selects the same ‘global’ authors in high proportions
  • men read female authors and women read male authors; the men reading female authors tend to choose those who include mystery, crime or war in their novels
  • 14 of 54 Cornwell mentions are men; 9 of 36 Follett mentions are men; these are the only two authors with more than 5 mentions amongst male respondents

What do the top authors have in common?

For the most part, these authors base their stories in long ago periods, writing about well-known historical figures either in a central of significant role. Most have written series or have concentrated on a particular time period so readers know what to expect and are familiar with their main characters.

According to a recently published book about best sellers (James W. Hall, Hit Lit: Cracking the Code of Twentieth Century’s Biggest Bestsellers), the three critical ingredients are maverick heroes, high stakes and hot sex. It seems to me that many of these authors fit that formula.

Check Sarah Johnson’s blog, Reading the Past, for further comments on the top authors.

On a personal note … I now have some highly recommended new authors to read.

Historical Fiction Survey – Connecting readers and writers

25 Wednesday Apr 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Historical Fiction Survey

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

connecting readers and writers, Goodreads, historical fiction, historical fiction survey, new dynamics in reading, power of social media, reading is a social experience

I am very pleased that the Historical Novel Society has posted an article about digital connections between readers and the books they read. Some very interesting insights on the use of social media and the interest people have in sharing what they read.

You can read all about it in on the Society’s Features page.

Peronne Museum dedicated to WWI

23 Monday Apr 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Writing about WWI

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

Musee de la grande guerre, Peronne Museum, WWI, WWI fiction, WWI posters

When I visited the war museum in Peronne, France, I was struck by its compelling simplicity, the displays laid out in simple frames on the floor, cream walls unadorned except for posters and a few simple shelves. Blind Regret – current work in progress – includes a trip to this museum, my protagonist in search of her grandfather’s mysterious past accompanied by a French man whom she has recently befriended.

~~~

Peronne was a larger town, its streets and squares decked with hanging baskets while citizens strolled about enjoying the sunshine. Housed in a medieval chateau, the museum’s collection was laid out sparingly for maximum impact. On the floor surrounded by ten-inch wooden frames were full uniforms and kits for French, British, Canadian and German soldiers. Similar frames housed rifles, ammunition clips and light trench mortars, a display of medical instruments, ambulance supplies, and signalling equipment. Further on, a display of camouflage techniques showed a hollowed out tree trunk used as an observation post and a range of ingenious materials to disguise artillery and command posts.  Along the walls were posters exhorting civilians to donate to the cause or help in some other fashion.

“What does this say, Pierre?” Grace pointed to a sign that seemed to be telling French citizens what to do during an air raid.

“Turn out all lights. Stay away from the windows. If possible, go to the basement. To avoid being hurt by breaking glass, open the windows but only if you have shutters.”

She chuckled. “Well, those are clear instructions.”

“We French love our regulations.”

They followed two men, one walking with a cane, the other holding his companion’s arm to assist with a short flight of stairs. The men stopped in front of a wooden leg displayed on a glass shelf next to a pair of wire-rimmed glasses. When the older man tapped his left leg with his cane, Grace heard a hollow thunk, thunk.

She looked at Pierre. He drew his lips together and nodded.

Near the exit were two rough tables full of debris. A sign indicated that every piece had been found in the trenches and battlefields of the Somme. Water bottles, helmets, boots, bully tins, pickaxes, knifes, petrol cans, breastplates, barbed wire – all rusted and dirty.

Grace sucked in her breath. “My God. This makes it real.”

“Mmm hmm. Almost as much impact as all the earlier exhibits combined.”

They said nothing more, merely stood and stared at the remnants of war.

~~~

By the way, the banner you see for this blog is a picture I took of the last exhibit Grace and Pierre see.

A note about the posters: The first poster concerns what I think is a magazine available for sale during the war. La Revanche means The Revenge. The second seems to invite Parisians to an art show featuring works done by artists on the front lines. Profits to go to the war effort. The third poster encourages women to make or buy dolls and send them to children in the Alsace and Lorraine areas. The final one needs no words of explanation.

Note: the photos are on a rather odd angle because they were mounted quite high on the walls.

Historical Fiction Survey – where readers find recommendations

22 Sunday Apr 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Historical Fiction, Historical Fiction Survey

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

book review magazines, historical fiction, historical fiction survey, historical novel society, New York Times, The Guardian, The Times

Highlights:

Readers provided their favourite digital and non-digital sources for book recommendations. I am very pleased that the Historical Novel Society will soon publish information and analysis about digital sources; in the meantime, here are results for non-digital sources:

Highlights:

  • The top three categories are: Other Newspapers (typically city-based papers), New York Times Book Review and Book Review Magazines
  • 19% of readers use only digital sources
  • Bookstores and general magazines are significantly ahead of libraries
  • The Times is almost exclusively mentioned by UK residents; the New York Times merits only one mention by a UK resident
  • Readers cited a range of book review magazines and general magazines
  • I’ve checked various demographics but see little variation based on sex, age or annual volume of books read.

I believe the most significant insight is that 1 in 5 readers indicated that they only use digital sources. Stay tuned for further information!

Stories that sell – readers tell us

19 Thursday Apr 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Historical Fiction, Writing Process, Historical Fiction Survey

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

New York Times, historical fiction survey, TBR Inside the List, James W. Hall, ingredients for best sellers, Philippa GRegory, Bernard Cornwell, Diana Gabaldon, Sharon Kay Penman

I’m a great follower of the Sunday New York Times book section – not only the reviews but the best seller lists and other regular columns. I look for ideas and trends and book recommendations.

TBR: Inside the List included a brief item called FLOUR, SUGAR, BUTTER commenting on James W. Hall’s book about best-selling novels. The following bits stood out:

  • “Three of the common features [of best selling novels] … are maverick heroes, high stakes and hot sex.”
  • “One ingredient not necessary in a best-seller … is graceful prose.”
  • And here, Hall is quoted directly. “The novel is a blue-collar form, and the language of best sellers reflects that legacy.”

I also cut out the NYT list of No. 1 books from one to thirty-five years ago published in early April.

  • 2011:  Toys – James Patterson & Neil McMahon
  • 2010:  The Help – Kathryn Stockett
  • 2007:  Nineteen Minutes – Jodi Picoult
  • 2002:  Everything’s Eventual – Steven King
  • 1997:  The Partner – John Grisham
  • 1992:  The Pelican Brief – John Grisham
  • 1987:  Fine Things – Danielle Steel
  • 1982:  The Parsifal Mosaic – Robert Ludlum
  • 1977:  Trinity – Leon Uris

Guess what? Readers chose maverick heroes, high stakes and, in most cases, hot sex.

Now, combine that with my recent historical fiction survey. What did 805 readers tell us? They love great stories. When asked about the genre they read or what detracts from historical fiction or their favourite authors – the data and comments point to a desire for great stories. What more maverick heroes with high stakes can you find than Philippa Gregory’s Elizabeth I or Sharon Kay Penman’s Eleanor of Aquitaine or Bernard Cornwell’s Richard Sharpe or Diana Gabaldon’s Jamie Fraser?

In the right proportions, flour, butter and sugar makes mouth-watering shortbread. Food for thought.

Historical Fiction Would Be Better If … 2012 Historical Fiction Survey

18 Wednesday Apr 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Historical Fiction, Historical Fiction Survey

≈ 47 Comments

Tags

2012, historical fiction survey, historical inaccuracies in fiction, readers' perspectives

588 readers responded with enthusiasm to the question “what detracts from your enjoyment of historical fiction”.

44% Inaccuracies – includes seeing modern sensibilities in a historic setting, anachronisms, dialogue that does not fit the period, poor research, moving major dates to suit a story line and so on.

2% Dialogue – several people complained that using too much dialogue from a long ago period takes away from the ease of reading.

9%  Sex & Violence – this refers to stories with too much sex and violence rather than too little :) In addition, some readers specifically mentioned gory battle scenes.

15%  Too much detail – refers to stories weighted down with reams of historical detail, almost as though the author wanted to include every bit of research found on a particular aspect of history.

15% Pace, Plot & Character – in the main, these comments referred to problems that can cause any story to fail. Poor writing, unrealistic characters, slow pace, stories that are too sensational. A few comments spoke of ‘wallpaper historicals’ and ‘romance disguised as historical fiction’. Another reader referred to the problem of ‘history being a substitute for story.

And 24% offered a range of other reasons from ‘I just don’t like historical fiction’ to ‘I haven’t got enough time to read’.

Let’s hear from a few readers directly:

I don’t like authors who just put in “Wikipedia” paragraphs instead of building historical atmosphere. The dialogue and setting should be natural, and appropriate to the characters, not contrived to check the boxes of historicity. The atmospheric details shouldn’t be over-explained like a dictionary, either.

Inaccuracies (minor changes to historical events) are OK if needed by the story and justified/explained in an afterword. I generally judge on the quality of the writing – even a good yarn can be spoiled by sloppy writing.

When an author tries to force an accent in writing. Over the top Scots, ridculous medieval talk, cockney that’s hard to understand…

When the history of the period and the story aren’t seamlessly drawn. If one is sacrificed for the other, it makes the overall pace of the story drag.

When they author deviates heavily from the historical record, such as making up battles or encounters that did not happen. Very irritating.

Oversexualization, wild inaccuracies, grotesquely detailed scenes of violence (Game of Thrones, for example), marginalization and objectification of women.

Characters that don’t interest me, poor pacing and shoddy research.

Too much grit – gore & violence Too much bodice ripping – I prefer to stay outside the bedroom if possible; and if not, I don’t need a catalogue of body positions.

Dry writing style with too much information fired at the reader like a textbook or recited by rote instead of incorporating details by making them part of the story. I like to learn stuff without being aware that I’m learning.

What do you think? I’d love to hear more from both readers and writers on this topic.

Historical Fiction Survey – Reasons not to read Historical Fiction

17 Tuesday Apr 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Historical Fiction, Historical Fiction Survey

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

historical fiction survey, Mary Tod, readers' perspectives

The survey asked those who rarely or never read historical fiction to comment on their reasons. Only 62 responded – a small sample from which to draw significant conclusions.

  • 34% indicated a preference for non-fiction or biographies
  • 17% said they like other genres such as mystery, literary fiction, Sci-fi and so on or that they preferred reading a wide range of genres
  • 10% offered various perceptions like ‘it’s boring’ or ‘it’s not for young people’ or ‘it’s only for the beach’
  • 8% expressed concerns about the quality of historical fiction
  • 8% said they don’t have enough time; this group is exclusively male

One further point of interest: several writers commented that they read almost exclusively historical non-fiction as a basis for writing historical fiction.

I’ve finished cataloguing favourite authors and will soon post on that topic. Stay tuned. Comments welcome.

Historical Fiction Survey – future topics

14 Saturday Apr 2012

Posted by awriterofhistory in Historical Fiction Survey

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

2012, historical fiction survey, Mary Tod, readers

Wednesday’s post included the first report of results from a recent historical fiction survey. Many have expressed interest in further analysis, here’s a list of topics I have planned:

  • She Says He Says – a look at different perspectives of female and male respondents
  • Boom, Bust and Echo - how age plays a role in attitudes
  • High Volume Readers – implications from those who consume a lot of historical fiction
  • Favourite Authors Abound – the top 10 or 20 authors and more
  • Historical Fiction Would Be Better If – readers have a say in what detracts from their enjoyment
  • Historical Fiction Is Not For Me – top reasons cited against historical fiction
  • Technology Takes Over – favourite websites, blogs and social media sources for recommendations and discussion

Some topics will be easier to compile than others. I’ll post them as quickly as possible and will look forward to your thoughts and speculation.

← Older posts

Recent Posts

  • WWI – What happened after the armistice?
  • WWII – On the Home Front
  • Four dimensions of researching WWI
  • Historical Fiction Author – Ben Kane
  • Grandma’s diary

Archives

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

BLOG CATEGORIES

Author Entrepreneur Book Club Gals Connecting Readers & Writers Family History Guest Posts Historical Fiction Historical Fiction Blogs Historical Fiction Enthusiasts Historical Fiction Survey Historical Non-Fiction Industry News Military Stories Researching historical fiction Top Historical Fiction Authors Top Historical Fiction Sites Uncategorized Writing about WWI Writing about WWII Writing Process

CONNECT ON FACEBOOK

CURRENTLY READING

No data found
Book recommendations, book reviews, quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists

Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.